Worst cities fo dating ziyoda dating
On the other hand, if your city is not compatible with your singlehood, you could be faced with an uphill battle.
Here are some of the worst cities for singles to live in from data in Wallet Hub's survey — and why.
Here's what the company determined to be the top 10 best cities for singles: That San Francisco is number one may come as a bit of a surprise. Wouldn't it be tougher for singles to mingle in such a high-cost environment?
After all, it's regularly billed as one of the most expensive U. Yes and no, and ultimately, the pros outweigh the cons."San Francisco is very expensive, but you must remember that people are also making more in San Francisco on average as well, which balances it out a bit," said Gonzalez.
Clubs, bars, speakeasies, and late night hotspots aren't their strong suite, so if you prefer meeting people through dating apps or at the bookstore — or dates at home and in the quiet of the wilderness — then maybe this spot is for you.
It's important to note that although the above-mentioned cities might be ranked as "bad" for singles and wannabe daters, beauty is still in the eye of the beholder.
But Gonzalez pointed out that Orlando "wins out when it comes to costs."The worst cities for singles — which include Greensboro, North Carolina, at number one; followed by Fontana, California; and Laredo, Texas — share one very unromantic quality: They're all pretty suburban.
It came in dead last in the "Dating Opportunities" track, which means there are very few "active Tinder users," a dismal singles gender balance, a low percentage of singles in the population, and few online dating opportunities and mobile dating opportunities.
The world isn't always a friendly place for single folks.
Thanks to toxic, happily-ever-after romantic ideals coupled with the biological drive to procreate, paired up people are often viewed as happier, healthier, and more "normal" than those flying solo.
And while San Francisco is just [as costly], San Francisco has more single people, which made the biggest difference."Still, Gonzalez, a former New Yorker, was surprised that the Big Apple didn't make the top ten."I also expected to see more college cities like Tempe, Arizona, make the Top 10, given the sheer amount of singles there," added Gonzalez.
One of the biggest reasons why college towns didn't make the cut is that their single populations are less into online and mobile dating opportunities."College is the last frontier of in-person dating; students in college towns may not yet be using those [mobile and online] avenues," said Gonzalez.It's more families and couples who are further into their relationships," said Gonzalez. Greensboro has the second highest number of males that we saw [in all 150 cities surveyed]."Related: Different Dates for Different States?The study found that New York City ranked 26 out of 150. How could San Francisco be on the list of best places for singles and not the Big Apple?"The reason NYC did not rank high is because of dating economics," said Gonzalez.